The Districts Dime

Great Outcomes in the DC Budget to Help Residents Move Up the Economic Ladder

May 28th, 2015 | by DCFPI Staff

When the DC Council unanimously approved the city’s budget yesterday, they put the final seal on a plan developed collaboratively with Mayor Bowser to invest in homeless services, affordable housing, workforce development, and other areas.

5.26.15 Budget AsksThe budget originally proposed by Mayor Bowser in April contained significant new investments in many of these areas, and additional funding was added during DC Council “mark ups” earlier this month. The final budget approved yesterday went even further, by fully funding the new Strategic Plan to End Homelessness and increasing resources for affordable housing and education.

The highlights of the final budget include the following:

Tremendous Progress on the Plan to End Homelessness

  • New capital and leasing funds will support replacement of the DC General Shelter.
  • The budget will help 455 individuals leave shelter through Rapid Re-Housing (RRH).
  • A new Daytime Service Center will give homeless individuals a place to go during the day.
  • $6.6 million will house 365 individuals and 110 families needing Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH), which combines long-term affordable housing and case management for residents who have been homeless a long time and have significant disabling conditions.
  • $4 million will go to Targeted Affordable Housing for 368 individuals and 147 families. This new initiative helps residents who either need help paying rent after their short-term RRH subsidy ends, or who are in PSH and no longer need intensive services but still need help paying rent.
  • The budget provides $500,000 to help homeless parenting/pregnant teens under 18.
  • More resources will go to emergency shelter, which has been underfunded in recent years, leading to chaotic shifts of resources each winter to meet the need.

Record Funding for Affordable Housing

  • $100 million for the Housing Production Trust Fund will support 1,000 or more homes per year.
  • $7.4 million for rental assistance (the Local Rent Supplement Program) will make housing affordable to very low-income residents. $2.4 million will be tied to 200 apartments built with the Housing Production Trust Fund, and $5 million will help 300 families pay rent in the private market.
  • Altogether, local housing funding will total over $200 million, a record level.

Protecting Families with Children Facing Loss of Income Assistance

  • The budget plan extends income and employment assistance for one year to more than 6,000 families in TANF. This will prevent 13,000 children from falling deeper into poverty.
  • It also gives the mayor and the new human services leadership a year to address a troubled TANF program that has not served families well.
  • The budget also provides time to develop a time limit extension policy. Some 44 states—but not DC—offer time limit extensions, recognizing that some families need more time to move to self-sufficiency.

“At-Risk” Funding Will Follow DCPS Students Next Year

  • Nearly 40,000 students in DCPS and charter schools fall into an “at-risk” funding category adopted for the current school year. The new budget requires that DCPS’ at-risk funding will flow next school year based on each school’s at-risk student population—so that each school will get its fair share of this funding.
  • Schools in Wards 1, 4, 7, and 8 will see more at-risk funding next year as a result of proper distribution.
  • The funds will be used for a variety of allowable purposes, including extending the school day, related arts programming and supplies, staffing, and technology.

Investment in New Job Training Models

  • The budget includes $500,000 to establish a Career Pathways Innovation Fund, to begin testing and expanding new models to blend adult literacy and occupational training.
  • The budget also adds $1.5 million for FY 2017 and subsequent years to design, pilot, and implement effective programs that create adult career pathways and improve the performance of adult education and training programs.

The Council will take a second and final vote on the Budget Support Act on June 16. That is the part of the budget that outlines changes in law needed to implement new proposals (such as a change in tax policy or in the TANF time limit). Based on a Wednesday court decision on DC’s budget autonomy law, the Council may also vote a second time on the Budget Request Act—the dollars and cents part. Without budget autonomy, that part of the budget gets voted on only once before going to Congress. But it is not entirely clear just yet how the court decision will play out.

For more background on these second votes, stay tuned to the District’s Dime next week.

To print a copy of today’s post, click here.

Leave a reply to this post

Council’s Budget Proposal Includes Both New Investments And Reductions in Affordable Housing and Human Services

May 27th, 2015 | by Wes Rivers

The budget crafted by the DC Council, which will be voted on today, includes both important enhancements and notable reductions to investments in affordable housing and human services proposed by the mayor. Most notably, the Council’s budget adds resources to fully fund a plan to end long-term homelessness and expands rental assistance to very low-income residents. However, the Council’s budget also scales back proposed funding for the Housing Production Trust Fund. The Council’s budget, as developed by Chairman Mendelson, also rolls back sales tax and parking tax increases proposed by the mayor.  Finally, the budget includes a last-minute proposal to provide a $90 million economic development subsidy for a project in a rapidly growing part of the city – Union Market – that raises concerns

As the Council moves to complete its work on the spending plan for the coming year, it should look to find a way to maintain the Housing Production Trust Fund – the main source for building and renovating affordable housing in DC – while also supporting its new investments to address the city’s urgent housing and homelessness crises. And it should hold off on the Union Market development subsidy so that it can receive a full legislative review.

The Council’s budget would maintain most of the mayor’s proposals and make several additions to help residents make ends meet and move ahead:

  • Fully funds the Interagency Council on Homelessness Strategic Plan ($3.5 million).
    • $1.8 million for Permanent Support Housing, which combines long-term affordable housing and case management for residents who have been homeless a long time and have significant disabling conditions.
    • $1.7 million for Targeted Affordable Housing for formerly homeless residents.  This helps residents after their short-term Rapid Re-Housing ends, and PSH residents who no longer need intensive services but still need help paying rent.
    • Restores a cut of $500,000 to Emergency Rental Assistance Program and adds $500,000 to support shelter and intensive services for minor-headed households.
  • Helps more residents pay the rent through the Local Rent Supplement Program ($5 million). This funding would help 330 families from becoming homeless and chips away at DC’s affordable housing crisis.  
  • Restores Some of the Cuts to the DC Office on Aging ($200,000). This would help fund meals for home-bound seniors. 
  • Makes additional investments in education ($1.2 Million). This will put additional money towards the DC Children and Youth Investment Trust, which will help fund afterschool and summer programming. 
  • Invests in new job training models:  The Council’s budget invests $500,000 to start developing a “career pathways” approach that blends adult education with occupational training.

However, amidst these increases the Chairman’s budget mark also includes a $9 million reduction in planned funding for the Housing Production Trust Fund. The proposal would take funds expected to go to the trust fund this year, and instead use them next year to count toward a planned $100 million funding level. That amounts to a $9 million reduction this year.

The DC Council made all of these investments, but they did not adopt the Mayor’s proposal to increase the sales tax rate from 5.75 percent to 6 percent or to increase the commercial parking tax rate from 18 percent to 22 percent. Instead of raising new revenue, the DC Council found additional savings elsewhere in the budget – including special purpose funds that have unneeded funding.

Finally, the DC Council’s proposal includes a large economic development subsidy that has not been fully vetted and could negatively impact the city’s finances for years. The budget proposes a $90 million subsidy to the developer Edens for a project near the thriving Union Market. The city would repay the subsidy using revenue generated from the completed project’s property taxes and sales taxes. Yet this proposal raises a number of couple of reasons.  First, the subsidy would count as debt for the city and put the city near the debt cap — the limit on how much it can borrow. This could limit the ability to borrow funds to pay for school, library, and other construction projects.  Second, economic development subsidies like these typically undergo a thorough review from, the Chief Financial Officer to assess if and how much subsidy is needed to move a project forward. With that said, the area is already developing quickly, and there is no evidence that the developer needs the incentive to complete development.  

To print a copy of today’s blog, click here

Leave a reply to this post

If a Surplus is Found, Council Should Fill in Budget Gaps

May 26th, 2015 | by DCFPI Staff

When the DC City Council votes tomorrow on next year’s budget, any extra money should be used to fund services important to DC residents, such as housing, homeless services and health care. Although the budget proposed by Mayor Bowser contained significant new investments in many of these areas, and changes were made during DC Council “mark-ups” last week, substantial gaps still remain.

DC residents understand that investing in things like schools and housing are important to improving the quality of life in the District and giving all residents the chance to thrive. In a recent poll, some 62 percent of DC residents responded that they would favor increasing services rather than rolling back the modest sales tax increase proposed in the budget.

Important areas where spending could be increased include:

5.26.15 Budget Asks

  • $1.8 million for Permanent Support Housing. PSH combines long-term affordable housing and case management for residents who have been homeless a long time and have a significant disabling condition. This funding would serve 115 individuals and would meet the targets laid out in new Interagency Council on Homelessness (ICH) Strategic Plan to End Homelessness.
  • $1.7 million for Targeted Affordable Housing for formerly homeless residents. This new initiative helps residents after their short-term Rapid Re-Housing ends, and PSH residents who no longer need intensive services but still need help paying rent. The additional funding would house 138 individuals, meeting the targets laid out in the ICH Strategic Plan. 
  • $5 million in Rental Assistance through the Local Rent Supplement Program. LRPS helps working poor and households on low fixed incomes pay rent in private market housing. This funding would help keep more than 300 families from becoming homeless and chip away at DC’s affordable housing crisis.  
  • $2.4 million to Restore Cuts to the DC Office on Aging. This would feed 390 seniors, provide 2,000 additional free rides to medical appointments, and keep wellness center programming intact.  
  • $2 million to restore funding for tobacco cessation and control. This would include investments in tobacco quit-lines and outreach campaigns for Medicaid beneficiaries. 
  • $10 million to help immigrant families get health insurance through the Healthcare Alliance. Healthcare Alliance participants must recertify their eligibility every six months through an in-person interview. New data suggest that this requirement creates a barrier to getting services. Switching to an annual recertification period would improve access to health services and reduce uncompensated care. 
  • $700,000 to Expand Kids Ride Free through age 24 for disconnected youth. Older youth (ages 22-24) who seek educational opportunities lack access to free bus and rail transportation offered to their younger classmates. Three-fourths of youth coming through the DC Re-Engagement Center identify transportation cost as a primary barrier to their sustained reengagement.

The District’s Dime will report back on the final budget later in the week.

To print a copy of today’s blog, click here.

 

Leave a reply to this post

Guest Blog: Cutting TANF Would Harm Domestic Violence Survivors

May 22nd, 2015 | by Tamaso Johnson, Policy Attorney at DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence

When a mother loses her job because of domestic violence, or when she flees an abusive partner who has prevented her from working outside the home or keeping her own money (frequent forms of financial abuse), safety can depend on having access to economic resources. Domestic violence affects individuals and families in the District at every socioeconomic level, from all wards and walks of life, but low-income parents are especially vulnerable to the impact of abuse. For victims without financial resources or family to fall back on, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and other public benefits provide a financial separation from abuse—and a bridge to independence.
TANF graphic

Because of the importance TANF can have for survivors of abuse, domestic violence advocates supported creating TANF time limit exemptions that ‘stop-the-clock’ for domestic violence survivors who have not hit the 60-month time limit. This was passed in 2012 and became accessible to survivors in late 2014 when funding was included in the budget. The exemption recognizes the safety and economic challenges faced by survivors and is a national best practice.

But that is not enough to make the District a safe place and help empower survivors. Victims of abuse could still reach the 60-month time limit if the abuse occurred before the stop-the-clock exemption went into effect. And if abuse occurs after a family has been cut off due to time limits, the District offers no way for a family to get back on temporarily. Domestic violence survivors who reach the time limit more frequently return to abusive partners than other survivors in a time of desperate financial need. [1] 

More than 6,000 District families face elimination of TANF benefits this October unless the Council supports the mayor’s proposal to delay these harmful cuts for one year. Among these families are survivors of domestic violence who would be eligible for a time limit extension in most other states, which recognize that some families need more time to move to self-sufficiency.

Delaying the benefit cut for one year will give the Department of Human Services time to improve services and develop a time limit extension policy that ensures particularly vulnerable families, including domestic violence survivors, have the extra time they need to move to self-sufficiency.

To print a copy of today’s blog, click here.


[1] Scott E., London A., and N. Myers. 2002. “Dangerous Dependencies: The Intersection of Welfare Reform and Domestic Violence.” Gender and Society 16: 876-898 at 882.

Leave a reply to this post

Most DC Residents Support Modest Sales Tax Increase To Fund Important Services, Poll Shows

May 21st, 2015 | by Wes Rivers

5.21.15 sales tax poll tableSeventy percent of District residents are in favor of Mayor Bowser’s proposal to raise the sales tax from 5.75 percent to 6 percent, as part of an effort to address a $200 million budget shortfall and pay for services like schools, housing, and homeless services. This is a key finding of a poll conducted on May 18 and 19 by Public Policy Polling for the DC Fiscal Policy Institute.

The poll also finds that most residents want the DC Council to invest more in services, rather than roll back the sales tax increase, when the Council votes on the budget on May 27.

The proposal would put DC’s sales tax rate in line with Maryland and Northern Virginia, and was recommended last year by the DC Tax Revision Commission. It would add 25 cents to every $100 of purchases made by residents, commuters, and visitors. 

By a 62%-to-28% margin, residents want the Council to devote any money it identifies to services such as affordable housing, rather than rolling back the modest sales tax increase.

The poll reveals strong support for the sales tax increase across all wards, among both White and African-American residents and all age groups

Last week, the Council’s Committee on Finance and Revenue recommended repealing the sales tax increase, and a repeal proposal may come before the full Council during the May 27 vote. Yet the poll shows that this would be contrary to the wishes of most residents. 

The results are clear: DC residents understand that building a city where everyone can succeed requires new commitments to housing, schools and other needs. And they support raising revenues to meet those goals. In this case, DC residents would rather see investments in affordable housing and schools than save 25 cents on a $100 purchase.

The poll results are here. The poll of 674 registered DC voters has a 4 percent margin of error.

To print a copy of today’s post, click here.

Leave a reply to this post
Next Page »